Fontaine v. Bank of America
Julie Elice Fontaine |
Bank of America, N.A., The Bank of New York Mellon and The Bank of New York |
3:2018cv02795 |
December 11, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Ruben B Brooks |
Barry Ted Moskowitz |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 dj |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Plaintiffs Opposition to Defendants Motion to Dismiss Complaint filed Nunc Pro Tunc 1/28/2019 re #3 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, filed by Julie Elice Fontaine. (sjm) |
Filing 11 Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz Accepting Nunc Pro Tunc 1/28/2019: Plaintiffs Opposition to Defendants Motion to Dismiss Complaint, from Plaintiff Julie Elice Fontaine. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Civ. L. Rule 5.1: Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 2/4/2019.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(sjm). |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by The Bank of New York Mellon . Identifying Corporate Parent The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation for The Bank of New York Mellon. (Kuiumdjian, Veronica) (sjm). (jao). |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Joinder by The Bank of New York Mellon re #4 Request for Judicial Notice,, #3 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , #1 Complaint, (Kuiumdjian, Veronica) (sjm). |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Julie Elice Fontaine. The Bank of New York Mellon served. (sjm) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Julie Elice Fontaine. Bank of America, N.A. served. (sjm) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Bank of America, N.A. re #4 Request for Judicial Notice,, #3 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , #5 Notice of Party With Financial Interest (Campbell, J. Owen) (sjm). |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Bank of America, N.A. . Identifying Corporate Parent Bank of America Corporation for Bank of America, N.A.. (Campbell, J. Owen) (sjm). (jao). |
Filing 4 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE by Bank of America, N.A. re #3 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit 21)(Campbell, J. Owen) (sjm). |
Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Bank of America, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities)(Campbell, J. Owen)Attorney J. Owen Campbell added to party Bank of America, N.A.(pty:dft) (sjm). |
Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. Summons has been provided to plaintiffs not receiving notice electronically. (mme) (jao). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Bank of America, N.A., The Bank of New York Mellon ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number CAS107320.), filed by Julie Elice Fontaine. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:18-cv-02795-BTM-RBB. Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz and Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks are assigned to the case. (Julie Elice Fontaine)(mme) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.