Gaither v. Madden et al
| Maurice Gaither |
| Xavier Becerra and Raymond Madden |
| 3:2018cv02817 |
| December 14, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Gonzalo P Curiel |
| Barbara Lynn Major |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER Construing Trust Account Statement as a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; Denying #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; and Dismissing Case Without Prejudice With Leave to Amend. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail Petitioner a blank motion to proceed in forma pauperis form, a blank First Amended Petition form, and a blank 42 U.S.C. civil rights complaint form together with a copy of this Order. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 1/8/19.(All non-registered users served forms and order via U.S. Mail Service)(dlg) (jao).
|
| Filing 2 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Maurice Gaither. (jms) |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Xavier Becerra, Raymond Madden, filed by Maurice Gaither.($5 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Not Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:18-cv-2817-GPC-BLM. Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel and Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening] (jms) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
