Kailikole v. Palomar Community College District et al
| Kathryn Kailikole |
| Does 1 through 25 and Palomar Community College District |
| 3:2018cv02877 |
| December 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Anthony J Battaglia |
| Michael S Berg |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 REPLY to Response to Motion re #9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Palomar Community College District. (Sloustcher, Adam) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Kathryn Kailikole. (Dwin, Evan) (acc). |
Filing 10
ORDER BY JUDGE BATTAGLIA: Setting Briefing Schedule re #9 MOTION to Dismiss : Responses due by 2/15/2019; Replies due by 2/22/2019; sur-replies will not be accepted. Motion hearing scheduled for 4/4/19 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 4A.(no document attached) (sc)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss by Palomar Community College District. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration Lisa Norman, #3 Request for Judicial Notice)(Sloustcher, Adam) (acc). |
|
Filing 8
ORDER finding as moot #5 Motion to Dismiss, in light of the amended complaint filed. (no document attached) (sc)
|
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Kathryn Kailikole. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B) (Dwin, Evan) (acc). |
|
Filing 6
ORDER BY JUDGE BATTAGLIA: Setting Briefing Schedule re #5 MOTION to Dismiss : Responses due by 1/25/2019; Replies due by 2/1/2019; sur-replies will not be accepted. Motion hearing scheduled for 4/4/19 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 4A.(no document attached) (sc)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss by Palomar Community College District. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities in Support, #2 Declaration of Lisa Norman in Support, #3 Request for Judicial Notice in Support)(Sloustcher, Adam) (acc). |
|
Filing 4
ORDER Granting #3 Joint Motion to Extend Time For Defendant to Respond to the Complaint. Defendant's time to file a responsive pleading is extended to 1/10/2019. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 1/3/2019. (acc)
|
| Filing 3 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Palomar Community College District. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Sloustcher in Support)(Sloustcher, Adam)Attorney Adam Frank Sloustcher added to party Palomar Community College District(pty:dft) Modified on 1/2/2019 to correct event type (acc). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Palomar Community College District . Identifying Other Affiliate Palomar Community College District for Palomar Community College District. (Sloustcher, Adam) (acc). (jao). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, case number 37-2018-00058754-CU-WT-NC. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-12033815), filed by Palomar Community College District. (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint, #2 State Court Civil Cover Sheet, #3 State Court Summons, #4 State Court Notice of Case Assignment and Case Management Conference, #5 State Court ADR Package & E-File Notice, #6 State Court Notice of Removal to Adverse Parties, #7 State Court Notice of Removal to Federal Court, #8 Declaration of Regina A. Petty, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:18-cv-2877-AJB-MSB. Judge Anthony J. Battaglia and Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg are assigned to the case.(jrm) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
