Emrit v. Soros et al
| Ronald Satish Emrit |
| Federal Communications Commission, Securities Exchange Commission, George Soros and Federal Trade Commission |
| 3:2019cv00039 |
| January 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
| Andrew G Schopler |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2674 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Dismissal for Improper Venue. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 2/11/2019.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh) (sjt). |
| Filing 4 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #3 Order to Show Cause. Mail sent to Ronald Satish Emrit. (anh) |
Filing 3
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Why This Case Should Not Be Dismissed for Improper Venue. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 1/9/2019.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ronald Satish Emrit. (jrm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Federal Communications Commission, Federal Trade Commission, Securities Exchange Commission, George Soros, IFP Filed, filed by Ronald Satish Emrit. (Attachments: #1 civil cover sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-39-CAB-AGS. Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo and Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler are assigned to the case. (Ronald Satish Emrit)(jrm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
