Martinez Ponce v. Whitaker et al
| Oscar Virgilio Martinez Ponce |
| David Harlow, Steven C. Stafford, Matthew Whitaker and John Kelly |
| 3:2019cv00098 |
| January 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Barry Ted Moskowitz |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER RE: PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD PROSEQUENDUM denying as moot #3 Motion for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad prosequendum. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 1/15/2019. (sjm)(sjt).
|
| Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad prosequendum by Oscar Virgilio Martinez Ponce. (Attachments: #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum)(tcf) |
| Filing 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum against David Harlow, John Kelly, Steven C. Stafford, Matthew Whitaker, No Fee Required, filed by Oscar Virgilio Martinez Ponce. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum)The new case number is 3:19-cv-98-BTM. Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz is assigned to the case. (Johnson, James)(tcf) (sjt). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Hearing: Writ Hearing set for 1/15/2019 02:30 PM in Courtroom 15B before Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz. (no document attached) (rfm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
