Martinez-Rodiguez v. Flores et al
| Paola Martinez-Rodiguez |
| Walter Brinton, Greg Archambeault, Pete Flores, Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Joseph Greene and Matthew Whitaker |
| 3:2019cv00130 |
| January 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Linda Lopez |
| Janis L Sammartino |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Paola Martinez-Rodiguez (Weiner, David) (jms). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Petitioner's Release by Paola Martinez-Rodiguez (Weiner, David) (jms). |
Filing 2
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why Petition should not be granted. Order to Show Cause Response due by 2/22/2018.. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 1/23/2019. (cc: US Attorney, Docs 1 and 2). (jpp)
|
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Greg Archambeault, Walter Brinton, Pete Flores, Joseph Greene, Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Matthew Whitaker, filed by Paola Martinez-Rodiguez.(Filing fee $5 - receipt number: 0974-12109246) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration of Brittany Castle, #3 Proof of Service)The new case number is 3:19-cv-130-JLS-LL. Judge Janis L. Sammartino and Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez are assigned to the case. (Weiner, David)[Case in Screening] (jms) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
