Turner v. M.T.S. et al
| David Bryan Turner, Jr. |
| City of El Cajon, County of San Diego, M.T.S., State of California and City of San Diego |
| 3:2019cv00147 |
| January 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Larry Alan Burns |
| Bernard G Skomal |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. This action is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close the docket. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 2/27/2019. (jdt) Modified on 2/27/2019 to indicate service to non-registered users via U.S. Mail Service (jdt).
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. In order to reinstate his case, Turner must pay the filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, no later than 2/25/2019. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 2/11/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jdt) (sjt).
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of El Cajon, City of San Diego, County of San Diego, M.T.S., State of California ( Filing fee DUE, $ 400.), filed by David Bryan Turner, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-00147-LAB-BGS. Judge Larry Alan Burns and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal are assigned to the case. (David Bryan Turner, Jr.)(mme) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
