Rutherford et al v. Gurudev Enterprises LLC et al
Plaintiff: James Rutherford and The Association 4 Equal Access
Defendant: DOES 1-10, Gurudev Enterprises LLC and Holiday Inn
Case Number: 3:2019cv00251
Filed: February 4, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Janis L Sammartino
Referring Judge: Nita L Stormes
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 19, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access of entire case with Prejudice (Hashemi, Babak) (jpp).
March 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER setting Telephonic Settlement Disposition Conference 4/19/2019 at 11:00am. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes on 3/19/2019.(jpp)
March 5, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Settlement of entire case by James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access (Hashemi, Babak) (jpp).
February 27, 2019 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by James Rutherford. Gurudev Enterprises LLC served. (Hashemi, Babak)(jpp).
February 27, 2019 Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by James Rutherford. Holiday Inn served. (Hashemi, Babak) (jpp).
February 5, 2019 Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (cdw) (jao).
February 4, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against DOES 1-10, Gurudev Enterprises LLC, Holiday Inn ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-12162580), filed by James Rutherford, The Association 4 Equal Access. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-00251-JLS-NLS. Judge Janis L. Sammartino and Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes are assigned to the case. (Hashemi, Babak)(cdw) (jao).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rutherford et al v. Gurudev Enterprises LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gurudev Enterprises LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Holiday Inn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Rutherford
Represented By: Babak Hashemi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: The Association 4 Equal Access
Represented By: Babak Hashemi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?