Kroessler v. CVS Health Corporation
James Kroessler |
CVS Health Corporation |
3:2019cv00277 |
February 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
Jill L Burkhardt |
Contract Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE by CVS Health Corporation re #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Lally, Amy) (anh). |
Filing 10 MOTION to Strike Complaint by CVS Health Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities)(Lally, Amy) (anh). |
Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by CVS Health Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities)(Lally, Amy) (anh). |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by CVS Health Corporation . Identifying Other Affiliate The Nature's Bounty Co., Other Affiliate Pharmacal Corporation for CVS Health Corporation. (Lally, Amy) (anh). (jao). |
Filing 7 ORDER re #6 Motion for Extension to Respond to Complaint. The motion for an extension until 4/8/2019 is denied. Defendant shall respond to the complaint on or before 3/19/2019, which is a de facto extension of 13 days. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 3/13/2019. (ag) |
Filing 6 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint by CVS Health Corporation. (Lally, Amy) (ag). |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance OF COUNSEL by Adriane K Peralta on behalf of CVS Health Corporation (Peralta, Adriane)Attorney Adriane K Peralta added to party CVS Health Corporation(pty:dft) (ag). |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance OF COUNSEL by Amy Pesapane Lally on behalf of CVS Health Corporation (Lally, Amy)Attorney Amy Pesapane Lally added to party CVS Health Corporation(pty:dft) (ag). |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by James Kroessler. CVS Health Corporation served. (Blood, Timothy) (anh). |
Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (mme) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against CVS Health Corporation ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-12174776.), filed by James Kroessler. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C)The new case number is 3:19-cv-00277-CAB-JLB. Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo and Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt are assigned to the case. (Blood, Timothy)(mme) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Kroessler v. CVS Health Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: CVS Health Corporation | |
Represented By: | Amy Pesapane Lally |
Represented By: | Adriane K Peralta |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: James Kroessler | |
Represented By: | Timothy G. Blood |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.