Innosset, LLC v. Jung et al
| Innosset, LLC |
| Jack Jung and Dog and Rooster, Inc. |
| 3:2019cv00342 |
| February 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Roger T Benitez |
| Jill L Burkhardt |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 18 U.S.C. § 1030 |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Innosset, LLC Notice of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice (Lyon, Scott) (anh). |
|
|
| Filing 5 Joint MOTION to Continue Reflecting Stipulation to Suspend All Deadlines in the Case by Innosset, LLC. (Lyon, Scott) (anh). |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Innosset, LLC. Jack Jung served. (Lyon, Scott) (anh). |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Innosset, LLC. Dog and Rooster, Inc. served. (Lyon, Scott) (anh). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (mme) (jao). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Dog and Rooster, Inc., Jack Jung ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-12215935.).), filed by Innosset, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)The new case number is 3:19-cv-00342-BEN-JLB. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt are assigned to the case. (Lyon, Scott)(mme) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.