Ham v. Cissna et al
| Sang Won Ham |
| Corinna Luna, Kirstijen Nielsen and L. Francis Cissna |
| 3:2019cv00391 |
| February 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Michael M Anello |
| William V Gallo |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0701 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal by Sang Won Ham. (Kim, Gary) (rmc). Modified on 4/22/2019 to terminate as Motion and convert to Notice with Chambers approval (rmc). |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (rmc) |
| Filing 2 Filing fee: $400, receipt number CAS109634, Paid on 3/5/2019 (rmc)(Fee receipt received for docketing 4/17/2019) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against L. Francis Cissna, Corinna Luna, Kirstijen Nielsen (***FEE DUE*** Filing fee $ 400.), filed by Sang Won Ham. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit L, #14 Exhibit M)The new case number is 3:19-cv-391-MMA-WVG. Judge Michael M. Anello and Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo are assigned to the case. (Kim, Gary)(lrc) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
