San Diego Coastkeeper et al v. Superior Ready Mix Concrete, L.P.
| San Diego Coastkeeper and Coastal Environmental Rights Foundation |
| Superior Ready Mix Concrete, L.P. |
| 3:2019cv00439 |
| March 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Karen S Crawford |
| Dana M Sabraw |
| Environmental Matters |
| 33 U.S.C. ยง 1251 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Coastal Environmental Rights Foundation, as to All Defendants. (Beaudin, Livia) (aef). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew John O'Malley on behalf of San Diego Coastkeeper (O'Malley, Matthew)Attorney Matthew John O'Malley added to party San Diego Coastkeeper(pty:pla) (aef). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (tcf) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Superior Ready Mix Concrete, L.P. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-12268147.), filed by San Diego Coastkeeper, Coastal Environmental Rights Foundation. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A)The new case number is 3:19-cv-439-DMS-KSC. Judge Dana M. Sabraw and Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford are assigned to the case. (Beaudin, Livia)(tcf) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
