Langer v. Jadallah et al
| Chris Langer |
| DOES 1-10, Charles I. Jadallah and LAZ Parking California, LLC |
| 3:2019cv00525 |
| March 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Michael M Anello |
| Barbara Lynn Major |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Chris Langer (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Carson, Chris) (rmc). |
Filing 8
Order Confirming Settlement and Setting Deadline to File a Voluntary Dismissal or Stipulation for Dismissal. The Court notes that Defendants have not served an answer or motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ordered to file his voluntary dismissal of the case or a stipulation for dismissal pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure no later than 7/2/2019. If Plaintiff files a stipulation for dismissal, a proposed order on the stipulation for dismissal must be e-mailed to the District Judge's chambers on the same day. If the signed stipulation for dismissal or voluntary dismissal is timely filed, the parties and attorneys are not required to make any further appearances before Judge Major. If the fully executed stipulation for dismissal or voluntary dismissal is not filed by 7/2/2019, then Plaintiff's counsel of record is required to appear in person for a Settlement Disposition Conference ("SDC"). The SDC will be held on 7/9/2019 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 3A. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major on 5/9/2019.(rmc)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Settlement and request to vacate all currently set dates by Chris Langer (Attachments: #1 proof of service)(Carson, Chris) Modified on 5/9/2019 to add filing attorney to docket (rmc). |
|
Filing 6
ORDER Denying #5 Joint Motion to Extend Time for Defendants to Respond to #1 Plaintiff's Complaint without Prejudice. Defendants acknowledge that their deadline to file a responsive pleading has already passed. The parties fail to establish excusable neglect for filing the instant motion after the applicable deadline. Accordingly, the Court denies the joint motion without prejudice. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 5/7/2019. (rmc)
|
| Filing 5 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer as to #1 Complaint, Laz Parking California, LLC and by Charles I. Jadallah. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Request to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint)(Kenny, Robert)Attorney Robert L Kenny added to party Charles I. Jadallah(pty:dft) Modified to correct event on 5/7/2019 (rmc). |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Chris Langer. LAZ Parking California, LLC served. (Handy, Russell) (rmc). |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Chris Langer. Charles I. Jadallah served. (Handy, Russell) (rmc). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (als) (jao). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DOES 1-10, Charles I. Jadallah, LAZ Parking California, LLC ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-12318090.), filed by Chris Langer. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-525-MMA-BLM. Judge Michael M. Anello and Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major are assigned to the case. (Handy, Russell)(als) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
