Advanced Dental Arts, P.C. v. NoLedge Productions LLC et al
Advanced Dental Arts, P.C. |
NoLedge Productions LLC and Phil Cho |
3:2019cv00562 |
March 27, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Karen S Crawford |
Jeffrey T Miller |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 bc |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 5/7/2019.(sjm)(dsn) |
Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Plaintiff is ordered to show cause why this matter should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction by 4/26/2019. Defendants are permitted to respond in writing by 5/3/2019, but not obligated, not to exceed 10 pages, with authority and evidence that it believes may assist Court in determining whether subject matter jurisdiction exists. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 4/19/2019. (jah) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (jrm) (jao). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Phil Cho, NoLedge Productions LLC ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-12345840.), filed by Advanced Dental Arts, P.C. (Attachments: #1 civil cover sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-562-JM-KSC. Judge Jeffrey T. Miller and Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford are assigned to the case. (Purdy, Andrew)(jrm) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.