Aguirre v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission et al
Michael J. Aguirre |
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission and DOES 1 to 10 |
3:2019cv00587 |
March 29, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Cynthia Bashant |
Karen S Crawford |
Marilyn L Huff |
Barbara Lynn Major |
Freedom of Information Act |
05 U.S.C. ยง 0552 fi |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies by United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of Tina Ennis with Exhibits, #3 Declaration of Katherine Parker with Exhibit)(Parker, Katherine). Modified on 6/17/2019 - Corrected motion event (jah). |
Filing 11 ORDER denying as moot Plaintiff's #7 Motion for Status Conference. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 6/3/2019. (jah) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine Lind Parker on behalf of United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Parker, Katherine). Attorney Katherine Lind Parker added to party United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (pty:dft). (jah). |
Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION for Status Conference filed by United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (Parker, Katherine). (jah). |
Filing 8 ORDER Requesting Response re #7 MOTION for Status Conference filed by Michael J. Aguirre. Court is not inclined to hold a status conference for this issue but it is unclear why the U. S. Attorney does not deem the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to be a U.S. Government Agency. Court orders U.S. Attorney to respond to Plaintiff's Motion by 5/31/2019. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 5/21/2019.(jah) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Status Conference by Michael J. Aguirre. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Maria Severson, #2 Proof of Service by Mail)(Severson, Maria). Modified on 5/20/2019 - Edited text (jah). |
Filing 6 ORDER OF TRANSFER PURSUANT TO LOW NUMBER RULE. Case reassigned to Judge Cynthia Bashant and Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major for all further proceedings. Judge Marilyn L. Huff, Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford no longer assigned to case. Create association to 3:19-cv-00495-BAS-BLM. The new case number is 19cv0587-BAS(BLM). Signed by Judge Marilyn L. Huff on 4/24/2019. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 4/22/2019. (jah) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE(S) by Michael J. Aguirre of case(s) 19cv0495-BAS-BLM. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Severson, Maria). Modified on 4/16/2019 - Proposed Low Number Transfer Order prepared and forwarded (jah). |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michael J. Aguirre. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission served. (Severson, Maria) |
Filing 3 Amended Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (mme) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (mme) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DOES 1 to 10, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-12355973.), filed by Michael J. Aguirre.The new case number is 3:19-cv-00587-H-KSC. Judge Marilyn L. Huff and Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford are assigned to the case. (Severson, Maria)(mme) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.