Austin v. Berryhill
| Debra Austin |
| Nancy A. Berryhill |
| 3:2019cv00604 |
| March 31, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| William V Gallo |
| Jeffrey T Miller |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0402 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD . (Attachments: #1 Index, #2 Pages 1-71, #3 Pages 72-127, #4 Pages 128-236, #5 Pages 237-282, #6 Pages 283-386, #7 Pages 387-585, #8 Pages 586-768, #9 Pages 769-794, #10 Pages 795-909, #11 Pages 910-956, #12 Pages 957-1115)(Parker, Katherine) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Debra Austin. Nancy A. Berryhill served. (Sangimino, Kaylin) (sjm). |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine Lind Parker on behalf of Nancy A. Berryhill (Parker, Katherine)Attorney Katherine Lind Parker added to party Nancy A. Berryhill(pty:dft) (dlg). |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Ben A Porter on behalf of Nancy A. Berryhill (Porter, Ben)Attorney Ben A Porter added to party Nancy A. Berryhill(pty:dft) (dlg). |
| Filing 6 SUPPLEMENTAL DOCUMENT by Debra Austin re #1 Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet. (Mendoza, Nichole) Q.C. Mailer re duplicate docket entry. Filer informed to file a withdrawal of document. (sjm). |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Kaylin Ashley Sangimino on behalf of Debra Austin (Sangimino, Kaylin)Attorney Kaylin Ashley Sangimino added to party Debra Austin(pty:pla) (sjm). |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (sjm) |
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; REFERRING MATTER TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE re #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. A copy of this Order was mailed to the United States Attorney General or an authorized representative. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 4/3/2019. (sjm)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Debra Austin. (mme) (jao). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill, IFP Filed, filed by Debra Austin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-00604-JM-WVG. Judge Jeffrey T. Miller and Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo are assigned to the case. (Mendoza, Nichole)(mme) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Austin v. Berryhill | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill | |
| Represented By: | U S Attorney CV |
| Represented By: | Katherine Lind Parker |
| Represented By: | Ben A Porter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Debra Austin | |
| Represented By: | Nichole Marie Mendoza |
| Represented By: | Kaylin Ashley Sangimino |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
