Reis v. Tavant Technologies et al
Plaintiff: Cathy Reis and Cathy Reis doing business as CPS
Defendant: Tavant Technologies and Hassan Rashid
Case Number: 3:2019cv00609
Filed: April 2, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Jill L Burkhardt
Referring Judge: William Q Hayes
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 0501
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 27, 2019 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cathy Reis. Hassan Rashid served. (ag)
June 27, 2019 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cathy Reis. Tavant Technologies served. (ag)
June 26, 2019 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Hassan Rashid, Tavant Technologies re #4 Notice of Party With Financial Interest, #3 MOTION to Dismiss to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Ball, Eric) (ag).
June 26, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Hassan Rashid, Tavant Technologies . No Parties With Financial Interest. (Ball, Eric) (ag).
June 26, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Hassan Rashid, Tavant Technologies. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, #2 Declaration of Eric J. Ball in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B)(Ball, Eric)Attorney Eric J. Ball added to party Hassan Rashid(pty:dft), Attorney Eric J. Ball added to party Tavant Technologies(pty:dft) (ag).
April 3, 2019 Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. Summons has been provided to plaintiffs not receiving notice electronically. (cdw)
April 2, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Hassan Rashid, Tavant Technologies ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number CAS110411), filed by Cathy Reis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-609-WQH-JLB. Judge William Q. Hayes and Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt are assigned to the case. (Reis, Cathy)(cdw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reis v. Tavant Technologies et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cathy Reis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cathy Reis doing business as CPS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tavant Technologies
Represented By: Eric J. Ball
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hassan Rashid
Represented By: Eric J. Ball
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?