Spikes v. Boden et al
Plaintiff: Karel Spikes
Defendant: Donald R. Boden, Does 1 Through 10, Highway Collective and Boden & Smith
Case Number: 3:2019cv00630
Filed: April 3, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Anthony J Battaglia
Referring Judge: Mitchell D Dembin
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 12, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Karel Spikes without Prejudice (Bentley, Geoffrey) (acc).
May 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER Granting #4 Ex Parte Motion to Extend Time to Respond. Defendants, Donald R. Boden and Boden & Smith, must respond to plaintiff's Complaint on or before 7/5/2019. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 5/15/2019. (acc)
May 14, 2019 Filing 4 Ex Parte MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Donald R. Boden, Boden & Smith. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Mitchell, Carrie)Attorney Carrie L Mitchell added to party Donald R. Boden(pty:dft), Attorney Carrie L Mitchell added to party Boden & Smith(pty:dft) (acc).
April 29, 2019 Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Karel Spikes. Donald R. Boden served. (Bentley, Geoffrey) (acc).
April 4, 2019 Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (cdw)
April 3, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Donald R. Boden, Boden & Smith, Does 1 Through 10, Highway Collective ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-12370049), filed by Karel Spikes. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-00630-AJB-MDD. Judge Anthony J. Battaglia and Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin are assigned to the case. (Bentley, Geoffrey)(cdw) (sjt).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Spikes v. Boden et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Donald R. Boden
Represented By: Carrie L Mitchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 Through 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Highway Collective
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Boden & Smith
Represented By: Carrie L Mitchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Karel Spikes
Represented By: Geoffrey Bentley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?