Hatcher v. Serina et al
Robert Hatcher |
San Diego Central Jail Medical Staff and SNR Serina |
3:2019cv00661 |
April 8, 2019 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California |
William Q Hayes |
Linda Lopez |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: The Court denies Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed IFP as barred by 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The Court dismisses the civil action sua sponte for failing to prepay the $400 civil and administrative filing fees required by 28 U.S.C. 1914(a). The Court certifies that an IFP appeal would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3).(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ag) |
![]() |
Filing 6 SUPPLEMENTAL Exhibits in Support of Complaint #1 by Robert Hatcher. Nunc Pro Tunc 4/15/2019.(jms) |
![]() |
Filing 4 SUPPLEMENTAL Motion to Proceed IFP by Robert Hatcher. Nunc Pro Tunc 4/16/2019 (jms) |
![]() |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Robert Hatcher. (jms) (jao). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against San Diego Central Jail Medical Staff, Serina, filed by Robert Hatcher.($400 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-661-WQH-LL. Judge William Q. Hayes and Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (jms) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.