Pierman v. Stryker Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Peter Eric Pierman
Defendant: Howmedica Osteonics Corp. and Stryker Corporation
Case Number: 3:2019cv00679
Filed: April 12, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Roger T Benitez
Referring Judge: Mitchell D Dembin
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 25, 2019 Filing 23 Minute Order issued by the Honorable Roger T. Benitez: Submitting #6 MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Transfer. Court to issue written Order. Motion Hearing date of 7/1/2019 is hereby vacated. (no document attached) (gxr)
June 24, 2019 Filing 22 REPLY to Response to Motion re #6 MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Transfer filed by Howmedica Osteonics Corp., Stryker Corporation. (Salinas, Daniel) (anh).
June 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER Approving the Pro Hac Vice Application of Leigh Ann Buziak, re #10 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 6/13/2019. (mdc)
June 17, 2019 Filing 20 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Transfer filed by Peter Eric Pierman. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice, #2 Declaration of Eric Pierman in Support of Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, #3 [Proposed] Order)(Haller, Anthony) QC Email re proposed order(anh).
June 13, 2019 Filing 19 PRO HAC APPROVED re #16 : Leigh Ann Buziak appearing for Plaintiff Peter Eric Pierman. (no document attached) (mdc)
June 13, 2019 Filing 18 PRO HAC APPROVED re #15 : Anthony Haller appearing for Plaintiff Peter Eric Pierman. (no document attached) (mdc)
June 13, 2019 Filing 17 PRO HAC APPROVED re #14 : Heidi Crikelair appearing for Plaintiff Peter Eric Pierman. (no document attached) (mdc)
June 13, 2019 Filing 16 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee received: $ 206 receipt number 0974-12586105 - See #10 .) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Leigh Ann Buziak)(Buziak, Leigh) Modified text on 6/13/2019 to add filing fee info. (mdc)
June 12, 2019 Filing 15 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee received: $ 206 receipt number 0974-12583779 - See #8 .) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Anthony Haller)(Haller, Anthony) Modified text on 6/13/2019 to add filing fee info. (mdc)
June 12, 2019 Filing 14 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee received: $ 206 receipt number 0974-12583782 - See #9 .) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Heidi G. Crikelair)(Crikelair, Heidi) Modified text on 6/13/2019 to add filing fee info. (mdc)
June 12, 2019 Filing 13 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee received: $ 206 receipt number 0974-12586105 - See #10 .) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Leigh Ann Buziak)(Buziak, Leigh) Modified on 6/13/2019 - Added filing fee info to text. Sent QC e-mail re missing signature. (mdc)
June 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER Denying the Pro Hac Vice Application of Heidi Crikelair Re: ECF No. #9 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 6/6/2019.(jrd)
June 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER Denying the Pro Hac Vice Application of Anthony B. Haller Re: ECF No. #8 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 6/6/2019.(jrd)
June 5, 2019 Filing 10 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 206 receipt number 0974-12586105.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Buziak, Leigh) (mdc)
June 4, 2019 Filing 9 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 206 receipt number 0974-12583782.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Crikelair, Heidi) (mdc)
June 4, 2019 Filing 8 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 206 receipt number 0974-12583779.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Haller, Anthony) (mdc)
May 24, 2019 Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Howmedica Osteonics Corp., Stryker Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Stryker Corporation for Howmedica Osteonics Corp., Stryker Corporation.. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Salinas, Daniel) (anh). (jao).
May 24, 2019 Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Transfer by Howmedica Osteonics Corp., Stryker Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service, #2 Memo of Points and Authorities, #3 Proof of Service, #4 Declaration of Joshua Salinas, #5 Proof of Service, #6 Request for Judicial Notice, #7 Exhibit 1, #8 Proof of Service)(Salinas, Daniel)Attorney Daniel Joshua Salinas added to party Howmedica Osteonics Corp.(pty:dft), Attorney Daniel Joshua Salinas added to party Stryker Corporation(pty:dft) (anh).
May 3, 2019 Filing 5 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint,, by Howmedica Osteonics Corp., Stryker Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Milligan, Robert)Attorney Robert B Milligan added to party Howmedica Osteonics Corp.(pty:dft), Attorney Robert B Milligan added to party Stryker Corporation(pty:dft) (anh).
May 1, 2019 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Peter Eric Pierman. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. served. (Olson, Gregory) (anh).
April 18, 2019 Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Peter Eric Pierman. Stryker Corporation served. (Olson, Gregory) (anh).
April 12, 2019 Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (als)
April 12, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Howmedica Osteonics Corp., Stryker Corporation ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-12403171.), filed by Peter Eric Pierman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A to Plaintiff Peter Eric Pierman's Complaint for Injunctive Relief, #3 Exhibit B to Plaintiff Peter Eric Pierman's Complaint for Injunctive Relief, #4 Exhibit C to Plaintiff Peter Eric Pierman's Complaint for Injunctive Relief)The new case number is 3:19-cv-00679-BEN-MDD. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin are assigned to the case. (Olson, Gregory)(als) (sjt).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pierman v. Stryker Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Represented By: Robert B Milligan
Represented By: Daniel Joshua Salinas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stryker Corporation
Represented By: Robert B Milligan
Represented By: Daniel Joshua Salinas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Peter Eric Pierman
Represented By: Gregory P Olson
Represented By: Heidi Crikelair
Represented By: Leigh Ann Buziak
Represented By: Jeffrey Rosenfeld
Represented By: Anthony Haller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?