Turner v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. et al
Plaintiff: Matthew Turner
Defendant: JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and DOES 1 through 100
Case Number: 3:2019cv00719
Filed: April 18, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Larry Alan Burns
Referring Judge: Andrew G Schopler
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Other
Cause of Action: 12 U.S.C. ยง 2605
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Chief Judge Larry Alan Burns Rejecting Document: Plaintiff's Responses to JPMorgan Chase's Affirmative Defenses, from Plaintiff Matthew Turner. Non-compliance with local rule(s), OTHER: FRCP (7)(a)(7) Court did not order a reply to answer. No provisions for acceptance. Signed by Chief Judge Larry Alan Burns on 7/1/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jdt) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/2/2019: #1 Rejected Document) (jdt).
June 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTE ENTRY (AGS): On June 28, 2019, the Court held an Early Neutral Evaluation. The case contingently settled, and the necessary terms were placed on the record. That record will be sealed pending further Court order. On August 22, 2019, at 11:30 a.m., the parties must call Judge Schopler's chambers to provide an oral status report on filing the joint motion to dismiss. Defendants' counsel is responsible for initiating the joint call to chambers with plaintiff on the line. Should the joint motion to dismiss be filed before that time, the obligation to call will be stricken without further Court order. In the event the contingent settlement falls through, the Court will hold a telephonic, attorneys only Case Management Conference on August 22, 2019, at 11:30 a.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler on 06/28/2019. (CD# 6/28/2019 AGS 10:30-10:40). (Plaintiff Matthew Turner, pro se). (Defendant Attorney Lukas Sosnicki). (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (no document attached) (mxa) Modified on 7/1/2019 (yeb).
June 21, 2019 Filing 7 JOINT DISCOVERY PLAN by JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. (Stepanyan, Hakop)Attorney Hakop Stepanyan added to party JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.(pty:dft) (jdt).
June 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler Rejecting Document: Plaintiff's Initial Disclosures, from Plaintiff Matthew Turner. Non-compliance with local rule(s), OTHER: Per Rule 26 (document no. #4 ) - initial disclosures due on June 14, 2019; per Rule 26(a)(1) initial disclosures are served on the other party, not filed. Rejected document was returned to the filer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler on 6/19/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jdt) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/19/2019: #1 Rejected Document) (jdt).
June 5, 2019 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Matthew Turner. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. served. (jdt)
May 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE AND ORDER: (1) for Early Neutral Evaluation and (2) Setting Rule 26 Compliance and Case Management Conference. An Early Neutral Evaluation and Case Management Conference will be held in the Chambers of Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler on 6/28/2019 at 9:00 AM. A Joint Discovery Plan must be filed on the CM/ECF system as well as lodged with Judge Schopler by 6/21/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler on 5/21/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jdt)
May 20, 2019 Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A..(Sosnicki, Lukas)Attorney Lukas Sosnicki added to party JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.(pty:dft) (jdt).
April 19, 2019 Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. Summons has been provided to plaintiffs not receiving notice electronically. (mme)
April 18, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against DOES 1 through 100, JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number CAS111030.), filed by Matthew Turner. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A-H)The new case number is 3:19-cv-00719-LAB-AGS. Judge Larry Alan Burns and Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler are assigned to the case. (Matthew Turner)(mme)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Turner v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.
Represented By: Hakop Stepanyan
Represented By: Lukas Sosnicki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1 through 100
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Matthew Turner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?