Joseph v. Hernandez et al
| Alonzo Joseph |
| A. Hernandez and M. Murillo |
| 3:2019cv00753 |
| April 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Ruth Bermudez Montenegro |
| Janis L Sammartino |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the civil action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to pay filing fee required by 28 USC 1914(a). (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp) (jao). |
Filing 3
ORDER (1) Denying #2 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis as barred by 28 USC 1915(g), and (2) Dismissing civil action without prejudice for failure to pay filing fee required by 28 USC 1914(a). Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 6/10/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp) (jao).
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Alonzo Joseph. (jms) (jao). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against A. Hernandez, M. Murillo, filed by Alonzo Joseph.($400 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-753-JLS-RBM. Judge Janis L. Sammartino and Magistrate Judge Ruth Bermudez Montenegro are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (jms) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
