Luminence, LLC v. Flash Spree, Inc., et al
| Luminence, LLC |
| Faisal Karim and Flash Spree, Inc. |
| 3:2019cv00762 |
| April 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Anthony J Battaglia |
| Roger T Benitez |
| Bernard G Skomal |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 0501 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Luminence, LLC. All Defendants served. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service Individual Defendant)(Capron, Matthew) (jao). |
| Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Roger T. Benitez is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Judge Anthony J. Battaglia for all further proceedings. The new case number is 19-cv-00762-AJB-BGS.(no document attached) (anh) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (jrm) (jao). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Faisal Karim, Flash Spree, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-12445302.), filed by Luminence, LLC. (Attachments: #1 civil cover sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-762-BEN-BGS. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal are assigned to the case. (Capron, Matthew)(jrm) (Copyright Form added on 4/25/2019; NEF regenerated: #2 copyright form) (jrm). [Copyright form mailed.] (jrm). (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
