Banuelos v. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Beatriz Banuelos
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number: 3:2019cv00785
Filed: April 29, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Michael S Berg
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 id
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 26, 2019 Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed (USM 285 form) by Beatriz Banuelos. Nancy A. Berryhill served at the Office of the Attorney General, 950 Pennsylvania, NW, Washington, DC. (tcf)
June 26, 2019 Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed (USM 285 form) by Beatriz Banuelos. Nancy A. Berryhill served at the Office of the Regional Counsel. (tcf)
June 26, 2019 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed (USM 285 form) by Beatriz Banuelos. Nancy A. Berryhill served to the Civil Process Clerk at the Office of the US Attorney. (tcf)
June 21, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine Lind Parker on behalf of Nancy A. Berryhill (Parker, Katherine)Attorney Katherine Lind Parker added to party Nancy A. Berryhill(pty:dft) (ag).
June 18, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Sharon Lahey on behalf of Nancy A. Berryhill (Lahey, Sharon)Attorney Sharon Lahey added to party Nancy A. Berryhill(pty:dft) (tcf).
May 13, 2019 Filing 7 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (Attachments: #1 IFP Letter)(ag)
May 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Granting #3 Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. US Marshal shall effect service of complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg on 5/9/2019. (IFP package prepared) (ag)
May 7, 2019 Filing 5 CONSENT to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, Pursuant to General Order 707, by Beatriz Banuelos. (cdw)
April 30, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE OF SOCIAL SECURITY CASE ASSIGNMENT. Pursuant to General Order 707, United States Magistrate Michael S. Berg has been randomly assigned. Plaintiff should print and complete the attached consent/declination form. The executed form must be received by the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of this notice. (mme) (jao).
April 29, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Beatriz Banuelos. (mme) (jao).
April 29, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Beatriz Banuelos. No Parties With Financial Interest. (mme) (jao).
April 29, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill, IFP Filed, filed by Beatriz Banuelos. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-00785-MSB. Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg is assigned to the case. (Shapiro, Brian)(mme) (jao).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Banuelos v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Beatriz Banuelos
Represented By: Brian C Shapiro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Represented By: U S Attorney CV
Represented By: Katherine Lind Parker
Represented By: Sharon Lahey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?