Banuelos v. Berryhill
Beatriz Banuelos |
Nancy A. Berryhill |
3:2019cv00785 |
April 29, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Michael S Berg |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 id |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed (USM 285 form) by Beatriz Banuelos. Nancy A. Berryhill served at the Office of the Attorney General, 950 Pennsylvania, NW, Washington, DC. (tcf) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed (USM 285 form) by Beatriz Banuelos. Nancy A. Berryhill served at the Office of the Regional Counsel. (tcf) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed (USM 285 form) by Beatriz Banuelos. Nancy A. Berryhill served to the Civil Process Clerk at the Office of the US Attorney. (tcf) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine Lind Parker on behalf of Nancy A. Berryhill (Parker, Katherine)Attorney Katherine Lind Parker added to party Nancy A. Berryhill(pty:dft) (ag). |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Sharon Lahey on behalf of Nancy A. Berryhill (Lahey, Sharon)Attorney Sharon Lahey added to party Nancy A. Berryhill(pty:dft) (tcf). |
Filing 7 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (Attachments: #1 IFP Letter)(ag) |
Filing 6 ORDER Granting #3 Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. US Marshal shall effect service of complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg on 5/9/2019. (IFP package prepared) (ag) |
Filing 5 CONSENT to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, Pursuant to General Order 707, by Beatriz Banuelos. (cdw) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF SOCIAL SECURITY CASE ASSIGNMENT. Pursuant to General Order 707, United States Magistrate Michael S. Berg has been randomly assigned. Plaintiff should print and complete the attached consent/declination form. The executed form must be received by the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of this notice. (mme) (jao). |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Beatriz Banuelos. (mme) (jao). |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Beatriz Banuelos. No Parties With Financial Interest. (mme) (jao). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill, IFP Filed, filed by Beatriz Banuelos. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-00785-MSB. Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg is assigned to the case. (Shapiro, Brian)(mme) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Banuelos v. Berryhill | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Beatriz Banuelos | |
Represented By: | Brian C Shapiro |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill | |
Represented By: | U S Attorney CV |
Represented By: | Katherine Lind Parker |
Represented By: | Sharon Lahey |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.