Battery Conservation Innovations, LLC v. InMotion Technology LLC
Battery Conservation Innovations, LLC |
InMotion Technology LLC |
3:2019cv00794 |
April 30, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Anthony J Battaglia |
Dana M Sabraw |
Bernard G Skomal |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 0271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Battery Conservation Innovations, LLC of Defendant InMotion Technology LLC (Anderson, Kirk) (aef). |
Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Battery Conservation Innovations, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Anderson, Kirk) Modified on 5/28/2019 QC email sent re proposed orders should not be attached (aef). |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Battery Conservation Innovations, LLC. InMotion Technology LLC served. (Anderson, Kirk) (aef). |
Filing 7 ORDER Approving the Pro Hac Vice Application of Jay B. Johnson, re #5 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 5/6/2019. (mdc) |
Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER. Judge Anthony J. Battaglia has declined assignment pursuant to General Order 598. Case reassigned to Judge Dana M. Sabraw for all further proceedings. The new case number is 19cv794 DMS (BGS).(no document attached) (jcj) |
Filing 5 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 206 receipt number 0974-12473641.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing - Oklahoma, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing Texas, #3 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing - Colorado)(Johnson, Jay) (dsn) |
Filing 4 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent and/or trademark number(s) *9,239,158* cc:USPTO. (cdw) (jao). |
Filing 3 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (cdw) (jao). |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Battery Conservation Innovations, LLC re #1 Complaint. No Parties With Financial Interest. (cdw) (jao). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against InMotion Technology LLC ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-12462043.), filed by Battery Conservation Innovations, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A)The new case number is 3:19-cv-00794-AJB-BGS. Judge Anthony J. Battaglia and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal are assigned to the case. (Anderson, Kirk)(cdw) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Battery Conservation Innovations, LLC v. InMotion Technology LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Battery Conservation Innovations, LLC | |
Represented By: | Kirk Anderson |
Represented By: | Jay Brett Johnson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: InMotion Technology LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.