Douglas v. BOP Director et al
| Nigel Nicholas Douglas |
| Melix, Unknown Others, Villanueva, BOP Director, Officer Zumkher, Cardenas, Gonzales, - and Joseph |
| 3:2019cv00822 |
| May 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Mitchell D Dembin |
| Dana M Sabraw |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Transfer Letter Received from Central District of California. Case number in other court is 5:19-cv-01015 (jpp) |
| Filing 3 Case transferred to Central District of California, Eastern Division. Files transferred electronically to: *Central District of California, Eastern Division*.*3470 Twelfth Street**Riverside, CA 92501-3801*. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 5/13/2019. (Attachments: #1 Transfer Order) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(aef)(jrd) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Nigel Nicholas Douglas. (jms) (jao). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against BOP Director, Cardenas, Gonzales, Joseph, Melix, Unknown Others, Villanueva, Zumkher, filed by Nigel Nicholas Douglas.($400 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-822-DMS-MDD. Judge Dana M. Sabraw and Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (jms) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
