Macaraeg v. City of San Diego et al
Plaintiff: Linda Macaraeg
Defendant: DOES 1-10 and City of San Diego
Case Number: 3:2019cv00847
Filed: May 6, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Karen S Crawford
Referring Judge: M James Lorenz
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12132
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 27, 2019 Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant City of San Diego's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by City of San Diego. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities in Support of Defendant City of San Diego's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, #2 Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, #3 Declaration of Danna W. Nicholas, #4 Exhibit 1, #5 Exhibit 2, #6 Exhibit 3, #7 Exhibit 4, #8 Declaration 5, #9 Proof of Service)(Nicholas, Danna) (sjt).
June 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER Granting Joint Motion for an Order Extending Time for Defendant City of San Diego to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. For good cause shown pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b), the parties' joint motion for an order extending time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is granted. No later than 6/27/2019, Defendant City of San Diego shall file and serve its response to Plaintiff Macaraeg's complaint. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 6/13/2019. (lrf)
June 12, 2019 Filing 4 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer by City of San Diego. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proof of Service)(Nicholas, Danna)Attorney Danna Marie Whit Nicholas added to party City of San Diego(pty:dft) (sjt).
June 3, 2019 Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Linda Macaraeg. City of San Diego served. (Handy, Russell) (sjt).
May 6, 2019 Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (als) (jao).
May 6, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of San Diego, DOES 1-10 ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-12476750.), filed by Linda Macaraeg. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-00847-L-KSC. Judge M. James Lorenz and Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford are assigned to the case. (Handy, Russell)(als) (jao).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Macaraeg v. City of San Diego et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Linda Macaraeg
Represented By: Russell C Handy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of San Diego
Represented By: Danna Marie Whit Nicholas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?