Crossfit, Inc. v. Matrix Solutions, LLC et al
| Crossfit, Inc. |
| ABC Corp., Matrix Solutions, LLC, Progenex Holdings, LLC, Fitness Trade sp. z o. o., Fitness Trade sp. z o. o. sp. k., Fitness Trade sp. z o. o. a Polish limited liability company doing business as Progenex, Matrix Solutions, LLC a Wyoming limited liability company doing business as Progenex, Fitness Trade sp. z o. o. sp. k. a Polish limited partnership doing business as Progenex and Progenex Holdings, LLC a Wyoming limited liability company doing business as Progenex |
| 3:2019cv00887 |
| May 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
| William V Gallo |
| William Q Hayes |
| Barbara Lynn Major |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
NOTICE AND ORDER for Early Neutral Evaluation Conference and Case Management Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major on 6/25/2019.(anh)
|
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, and, COUNTERCLAIM against Crossfit, Inc. by Matrix Solutions, LLC, Progenex Holdings, LLC.(Johnson, Brian) (anh). |
|
Filing 10
ORDER Denying #9 Motion to Continue Responsive Pleading Deadline. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 6/17/2019. (aef)
|
| Filing 9 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Matrix Solutions, LLC, Progenex Holdings, LLC. (Johnson, Brian) (anh). |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian C. Johnson on behalf of Matrix Solutions, LLC, Progenex Holdings, LLC (Johnson, Brian)Attorney Brian C. Johnson added to party Matrix Solutions, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Brian C. Johnson added to party Progenex Holdings, LLC(pty:dft) (anh). |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Crossfit, Inc.. Progenex Holdings, LLC served. (Torp, Lyndsey) (anh). |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Crossfit, Inc.. Matrix Solutions, LLC served. (Torp, Lyndsey) (anh). |
|
Filing 5
ORDER OF TRANSFER PURSUANT TO LOW NUMBER RULE. Case reassigned to Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo and Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major for all further proceedings. Judge William Q. Hayes, Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo no longer assigned to case. Create association to 3:18-cv-02903-CAB-BLM. The new case number is 19cv887-CAB-BLM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major on 5/21/2019. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 5/20/2019.(sjm)
|
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Crossfit, Inc.. No Corporate Parents/Interested Parties. (Torp, Lyndsey) (ag). |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (mme) (jao). |
| Filing 2 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent and/or trademark number(s) *3,007,458*, *5,230799*, *5,045,737*, *4,895,992*, *4,049,689*, *5,212,742*, *5,212,743*, *5,212,744*, *4,049,340*, *4,049,339* cc:USPTO (mme)(jao). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against ABC Corp., Fitness Trade sp. z o. o., Fitness Trade sp. z o. o. sp. k., Matrix Solutions, LLC, Progenex Holdings, LLC ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-12500815.), filed by Crossfit, Inc..The new case number is 3:19-cv-00887-WQH-WVG. Judge William Q. Hayes and Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo are assigned to the case. (Torp, Lyndsey)(mme) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
