Patton v. Moneytree Inc.
Plaintiff: Allen L. Patton
Defendant: Moneytree Inc. and Moneytree Inc. doing business as Moneytree Financial Services
Case Number: 3:2019cv00919
Filed: May 16, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Gonzalo P Curiel
Referring Judge: Andrew G Schopler
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 3, 2019 Filing 10 Plaintiff's ANSWER to #8 Crossclaim by Allen L. Patton.(Daher, Marwan) (jrm).
June 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE AND ORDER for Early Neutral Evaluation and Case Management Conference. An Early Neutral Evaluation and Case Management Conference will be held in the Chambers of Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler on September 3, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler on 6/18/19.(dlg)
June 12, 2019 Filing 8 CROSSCLAIM against Allen L. Patton, filed by Moneytree Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Cross-Complaint) (Rister, Christine) (dlg).
June 12, 2019 Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Moneytree Inc..(Rister, Christine) (dlg).
June 3, 2019 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Allen L. Patton. Moneytree Inc. served. (Wajda, Nicholas) (dlg).
May 29, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Christine Marie Rister on behalf of Moneytree Inc. (Rister, Christine)Attorney Christine Marie Rister added to party Moneytree Inc.(pty:dft) (dlg).
May 24, 2019 Filing 4 PRO HAC APPROVED re #3 : Marwan R. Daher appearing for Plaintiff Allen L. Patton. (no document attached) (mdc)
May 24, 2019 Filing 3 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 206 receipt number 0974-12549914.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Daher, Marwan) (Main Document 3 replaced on 5/24/2019 to correct file format.) (mdc)
May 16, 2019 Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (jxv)(jrd)
May 16, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT With Jury Demand Against Moneytree Inc. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-12516923.), filed by Allen Patton. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-00919-GPC-AGS. Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel and Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler are assigned to the case. (Wajda, Nicholas)(jxv)(jrd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Patton v. Moneytree Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Allen L. Patton
Represented By: Nicholas M Wajda
Represented By: Marwan R. Daher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Moneytree Inc.
Represented By: Christine Marie Rister
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Moneytree Inc. doing business as Moneytree Financial Services
Represented By: Christine Marie Rister
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?