Barclay v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
Christopher R. Barclay |
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London |
Sullivan International Group, Inc. |
3:2019cv01008 |
May 29, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
William Q Hayes |
Nita L Stormes |
Bankruptcy Withdrawl |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 REPLY to Response to Motion re 1 MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF REFERENCE Bankruptcy Court case number 15-02281-LT7. Adversary Number 19-90031-LT. BRIT UW LIMITED'S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO WITHDRAW THE REFERENCE filed by Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London. (Simpson, Sean) (tcf). |
Filing 3 RESPONSE in Opposition re 1 MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF REFERENCE Bankruptcy Court case number 15-02281-LT7. Adversary Number 19-90031-LT. filed by Christopher R. Barclay. (Finlayson, Jesse) (ag). |
Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER: Any responses in opposition to the Motion to Withdraw (ECF No. 1 ) shall be filed on or before 7/8/2019. Any replies shall be filed on or before 7/15/2019. The Court orders no oral argument on the Motion at this time. (no document attached) (ag) |
Filing 1 MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF REFERENCE. Bankruptcy Court case number 15-02281-LT7. Adversary Number 19-90031-LT. By Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London. (no document attached) (cdw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.