Zietz v. San Bernardino Sheriff's Department et al
| William Frederick Zietz |
| San Bernardino Sheriff and San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department Detention and Corrections Bureau |
| 3:2019cv01048 |
| June 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Janis L Sammartino |
| Nita L Stormes |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 bv |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Case transferred to District of Central District of California, Eastern Division. Files transferred electronically to: *District of Central District of California, Eastern Division*.*3470 12th Street, Riverside, CA 92501*. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 6/19/2019. (Attachments: #1 transfer order) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp) (jao). |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by William Frederick Zietz. (jms) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Detension and Corrections Bureau, San Bernardino Sheriff's Department, filed by William Frederick Zietz.($400 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-1048-JLS-NLS. Judge Janis L. Sammartino and Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (jms) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
