Hatcher v. Hang et al
Plaintiff: Robert Hatcher and Robert Lee Jackson
Defendant: Ronald Hang and Joshua Brisbane
Case Number: 3:2019cv01182
Filed: June 21, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Cathy Ann Bencivengo
Referring Judge: Mitchell D Dembin
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 30, 2019 Filing 7 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #6 Notice and Order of Document Discrepancies,. Mail sent to Robert Hatcher. (anh)
July 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo Rejecting Document: Motion to Proceed IFP, from Plaintiff Robert Hatcher. Non-compliance with local rule(s), OTHER: Case closed, Rejected document was returned to the filer. Signed by chambers of Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 7/12/2019.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/12/2019: #1 Rejected Document) (anh).
July 10, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Change of Address by Robert Hatcher (jms)
July 2, 2019 Filing 4 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment in this civil action is dismissed sua sponte without prejudice. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mme)
July 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER re: #2 (1) Denying Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis as Barred by 28 USC 1915(g). (2) Dismissing Civil Action Without Prejudice For Failure to Pay Filing Fee Required by 28 U.S.C. 1914(a). Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 07/01/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mme) (sjt).
June 21, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Robert Hatcher. (jms) (jao).
June 21, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Joshua Brisbane, Ronald Hang, filed by Robert Hatcher.($400 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-1182-CAB-MDD. Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo and Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (jms) (jao).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hatcher v. Hang et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Hatcher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Lee Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ronald Hang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joshua Brisbane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?