Solomon v. First Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company, et al
Stephen Solomon |
First Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company and Tiffany & Company |
3:2019cv01203 |
June 27, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Barbara Lynn Major |
Janis L Sammartino |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE AND ORDER for Early Neutral Evaluation Conference and Case Management Conference. Early Neutral Evaluation set for 9/23/2019 at 9:30am. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major on 8/14/2019.(jpp) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Tiffany & Company. (Attachments: #1 Rule 7.1 Certificate)(Nadel, Darren)Attorney Darren E Nadel added to party Tiffany & Company(pty:dft) (jpp). |
Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (jxv) (jao). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against First Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company, Tiffany & Company ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-12663863.), filed by Stephen Solomon. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-01203-JLS-BLM. Judge Janis L. Sammartino and Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major are assigned to the case. (Bonnici, Joshua)(jxv) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.