Hadgu v. DHS
Bahta Daniel Hadgu |
DHS |
3:2019cv01314 |
July 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Cynthia Bashant |
William V Gallo |
Mandamus & Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Caroline Clark Prime on behalf of DHS (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Prime, Caroline)Attorney Caroline Clark Prime added to party DHS(pty:res)(jms). |
Filing 8 STATUS REPORT by DHS. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Oliver Castaneda, #2 Proof of Service)(Prime, Caroline) (jms). |
Filing 7 ORDER DENYING PETITION. Court denies the Petition #4 without prejudice. Because Petitioner's claim is only premature. Court will retain jurisdiction over the Petition. Respondent is ordered to file a status report by 9/23/2019 regarding the Government's efforts to remove Petitioner to Eritrea. If it becomes evident to Court that Petitioner's removal is not forthcoming, Court will issue an order for Respondent to show cause why Petitioner should not be released. Court advises Petitioner that if he is still on government custody after 9/21/2019, he may file a motion to reopen the Petition. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 8/13/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jah) (sjt). |
Filing 6 RETURN TO PETITION by DHS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-K, #2 Proof of Service)(Prime, Caroline) (jms). |
Filing 5 Exhibits by Bahta Daniel Hadgu re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (jms) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE(S) by DHS of case(s) 19cv1316 . (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Prime, Caroline) LNO Prepared (jms). |
Filing 3 ORDER FOR RESPONSE TO PETITION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Bahta Daniel Hadgu. Respondent DHS is ordered to file a response to the Petition by 7/31/2019. Court will determine whether further briefing is necessary after the Govt files its response. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 7/17/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jah) |
Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Michael M. Anello is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Judge Cynthia Bashant for all further proceedings. The new case number is 19cv1314BAS-WVG.(no document attached) (smd) |
Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against DHS, filed by Bahta Daniel Hadgu.(Filing fee $5 - receipt number: 113606) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-1314-MMA-WVG. Judge Michael M. Anello and Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo are assigned to the case.(jms) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hadgu v. DHS | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: DHS | |
Represented By: | U S Attorney CV |
Represented By: | Caroline Clark Prime |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Bahta Daniel Hadgu | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.