Diakite v. Poladian et al
Plaintiff: Amadou Diakite
Defendant: R. Longworth, M. Poladian and Doe 1-50
Case Number: 3:2019cv01341
Filed: July 17, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Michael S Berg
Referring Judge: Dana M Sabraw
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983pr
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 7, 2019 Filing 4 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiffs not receiving notice electronically. (Attachments: #1 IFP Letter)(aef)
August 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: 1) Granting #2 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis and 2) Directing U.S. Marshal to Effect Service of Complaint and Summons pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(d) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3). The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a) (ECF No. 2); ORDERS the Secretary of the CDCR, or his designee, to collect from Plaintiff's prison trust account the $350 balance of the filing fee owed in this case by collecting monthly payments from the trust account in an amount equal to 20% of the preceding month income credited to the account and forward payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 in accordance with 28 USC 1915(b)(2); ORDERS the U.S. Marshal to serve a copy of the Complaint and summons upon Defendants Poladian and Longworth as directed by Plaintiff on the USM Form 285s provided to him. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 8/7/2019. (Order electronically transmitted to Secretary of CDCR)(IFP Package mailed to Plaintiff) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(aef)
July 17, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Amadou Diakite. (jms) (jao).
July 17, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Doe 1-50, R. Longworth, M. Poladian, filed by Amadou Diakite.($400 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-1341-DMS-MSB. Judge Dana M. Sabraw and Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (jms) (jao).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Diakite v. Poladian et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R. Longworth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M. Poladian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doe 1-50
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amadou Diakite
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?