Cowan v. Elsevier, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Andrea Cowan
Defendant: Elsevier, Inc. and Does 1 Through 10
Case Number: 3:2019cv01380
Filed: July 24, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: William Q Hayes
Referring Judge: Bernard G Skomal
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 wt
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 30, 2019 Filing 6 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Andrea Cowan. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Moore, Suzy) (tcf).
July 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE AND ORDER: (1) for Early Neutral Evaluation Conference, (2) Setting Rule 26 Compliance and Case Management Conference. An Early Neutral Evaluation is set for 11/1/2019 at 1:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal. In the event the case does not settle at the ENE, a Case Management Conference, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b) will be held at the conclusion of the settlement conference. A Joint Discovery Plan is due by 10/18/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal on 7/26/2019.(ag)
July 26, 2019 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Elsevier, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal,, #2 Answer to Complaint (Notice of Removal), #3 Notice of Party With Financial Interest (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, Part 1 to Certificate of Service Re Notice to Adverse Party and Clerk of the California Superior Court, #2 Exhibit 1, Part 2 to Certificate of Service Re Notice to Adverse Party and Clerk of the California Superior Court)(Khatib, Mazen) (ag).
July 24, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Elsevier, Inc. Identifying Corporate Parent RELX PLC for Elsevier, Inc. (jmo)
July 24, 2019 Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Elsevier, Inc. (jmo)
July 24, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Superior Court of the State of California County of San Diego, case number 37-2019-00027714-CU-WT-CTL. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-12756924), filed by Elsevier, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - State Court Summons, #4 Exhibit C - State Court Answer, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Declaration of Mazen I. Khatib, #8 Declaration of Wendy Hultmark, #9 Request for Judicial Notice)The new case number is 3:19-cv-01380-WQH-BGS. Judge William Q. Hayes and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal are assigned to the case.(jmo) (sjt).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cowan v. Elsevier, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Elsevier, Inc.
Represented By: Mazen Khatib
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 Through 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrea Cowan
Represented By: Suzy C. Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?