Pilley v. ECSD Management, LLC
| G. Austin Pilley |
| ECSD Management, LLC and ECSD Management, LLC doing business as Apothekare |
| 3:2019cv01414 |
| July 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| William Q Hayes |
| Barbara Lynn Major |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 0227 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Ronald Marron on behalf of G. Austin Pilley (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Marron, Ronald)Attorney Ronald Marron added to party G. Austin Pilley(pty:pla) (ag). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by James Edward Pilley on behalf of G. Austin Pilley (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Pilley, James)Attorney James Edward Pilley added to party G. Austin Pilley(pty:pla) (tcf). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (sxa) (jao). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against ECSD Management, LLC ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-12770315.), filed by G. Austin Pilley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-01414-WQH-BLM. Judge William Q. Hayes and Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major are assigned to the case. (Gallucci, Kas)(sxa) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
