(PC) Salcido v. Warden, et al.
Paul Salcido |
Chief Medical Officer and - Warden |
3:2019cv01420 |
July 30, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
Jill L Burkhardt |
Larry Alan Burns |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER: 1) Granting Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #6 ); and 2) Dismissing Complaint for Failing to State a Claim Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) and 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b). The Court orders the Secretary CDCR, or his designee, is ordered to collect from prison trust account the $2.23 initial filing fee assessed, if those funds are available at the time this Order is executed, and to forward whatever balance remains of the full $350 owed in monthly payments in an amount equal to twenty percent (20%) of the preceding month's income to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in Plaintiff's account exceeds $10 pursuant to 28 USC 1915(b)(2). The Court directs the Clerk of the Court to serve a copy of this Order on Ralph Diaz, Secretary, CDCR, P.O. Box 942883, Sacramento, California 94283-0001. The Court grants Plaintiff forty-five (45) days leave from the date of this Order in which to file an Amended Complaint which cures the deficiencies of pleading noted. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail Plaintiff a court approved civil rights form complaint for his use in amending. Signed by Chief Judge Larry Alan Burns on 8/28/2019. (Order electronically transmitted to Secretary of CDCR) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service. Blank copy of Civil Rights Complaint form sent to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail Service.) (jdt) (sjt). |
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Paul Salcido. (jms) |
Filing 5 ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION for Failing to Prepay Filing Fees Required by 28 U.S.C. 1914(a). The Court grants Plaintiff forty-five (45) days leave from the date this Order is filed to: (a) prepay the entire $400 civil filing and administrative fee in full; or (b) complete and file a Motion to Proceed IFP which complies with 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(2) and S.D. Cal. CivLR 3.2(b). The Court directs the Clerk of the Court to provide Plaintiff with the Court's approved form "Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Chief Judge Larry Alan Burns on 8/2/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service. Copy of blank IFP form sent via U.S. Mail to Plaintiff.) (jdt) (sjt). |
Filing 3 Case transferred in from District of California Eastern; Case Number 1:19-cv-01015. Original file received electronically |
Filing 4 Chief Judge Larry Alan Burns and Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt assigned to transfer case from Eastern District of California. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(no document attached) (jms) |
Filing 2 ORDER TRANSFERRING Case to the Southern District of California, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 7/29/19. (Marrujo, C) [Transferred from California Eastern on 7/30/2019.] |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Order, Case Transferred Out to Another District served on Paul Salcido. (Marrujo, C) [Transferred from California Eastern on 7/30/2019.] |
Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Chief Medical Officer, Warden by Paul Salcido.(Lundstrom, T) [Transferred from California Eastern on 7/30/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.