Durant v. A-T.E.A.M. Contractors, Inc et al
John Durant |
A-T.E.A.M. Contractors, Inc and James Codde |
3:2019cv01453 |
August 2, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Roger T Benitez |
William V Gallo |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 0101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by John Durant re #4 Waiver of Service Executed, #3 Waiver of Service Executed (Burns, Leslie) (mme). |
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by John Durant, as to A-T.E.A.M. Contractors, Inc. (Burns, Leslie) (mme). |
Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by John Durant, as to James Codde. (Burns, Leslie) (mme). |
Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (sxa) (jao). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against A-T.E.A.M. Contractors, Inc, James Codde ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-12788037.), filed by John Durant. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A Photo, #3 Exhibit B Copyright Certificate, #4 Exhibit C Infringing Uses, #5 Exhibit D Metadata, #6 Exhibit E Emails, #7 Copyright Report) [Copyright Report Mailed] The new case number is 3:19-cv-01453-BEN-WVG. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo are assigned to the case. (Burns, Leslie)(sxa) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.