Moore v. Pollard et al
| Joseph C. Moore |
| W.M. Pollard and Attorney General, California |
| 3:2019cv01676 |
| September 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Karen S Crawford |
| Gonzalo P Curiel |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Transfer Letter Received from Central District of California. Case number in other court is 2:19-cv-07771 (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mme) |
| Filing 3 Case transferred to District of Central District of California, Western Division. Files transferred electronically to: *District of Central District of California, Western Division*.. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 9/9/19. #1 Transfer Order) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dlg) (jao). |
| Filing 2 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Joseph C. Moore. (jms) |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Attorney General, California, W.M. Pollard, filed by Joseph C. Moore.($5 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Not Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-1676-GPC-KSC. Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel and Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford are assigned to the case.(jms) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
