Welch v. Saul
| Darren Allister Welch |
| Andrew Saul |
| 3:2019cv01679 |
| September 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Roger T Benitez |
| Linda Lopez |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 id |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER (1) Granting #2 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis; (2) Dismissing the Complaint without Prejudice for Failure to State a Claim. The Court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff's complaint. Plaintiff MAY FILE an amended complaint on or before November 4, 2019. Should Plaintiff fail to file an amended complaint within the time provided, the Court may enter a final order dismissing this civil action with prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez on 10/3/2019. (aef)
|
| Filing 7 Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, Pursuant to General Order 707, by Darren Allister Welch. Nunc Pro Tunc 09/27/2019 (mme) |
|
Filing 6
Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Roger T. Benitez Accepting Document: Consent / Declination Form, from Plaintiff Darren Allister Welch. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Civ. L. Rule 7.1: Date noticed for hearing not in compliance with rules/documents are not timely. Nunc Pro Tunc 09/27/19. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 09/30/2019.(mme)
|
| Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER OF TRANSFER. Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez is no longer assigned as presiding judge. Case reassigned to Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez for all further proceedings. The new case number is 19CV1679-BEN-LL.(no document attached) (sjt) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF SOCIAL SECURITY CASE ASSIGNMENT. Pursuant to General Order 707, United States Magistrate Linda Lopez has been randomly assigned. Plaintiff should print and complete the attached consent/declination form. The executed form must be received by the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of this notice. (jxv) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Darren Allister Welch. No Parties With Financial Interest. (jxv) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Darren Allister Welch. (jxv) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, IFP Filed, filed by Darren Allister Welch. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-01679-LL. Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez is assigned to the case. (Rohlfing, Lawrence)(jxv) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Welch v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Represented By: | U S Attorney CV |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Darren Allister Welch | |
| Represented By: | Lawrence D Rohlfing |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
