Calm Creek, Inc v. Juhan et al
| Calm Creek, Inc |
| Does 1 through 5 and Ernestine Juhan |
| 3:2019cv01724 |
| September 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Cynthia Bashant |
| Andrew G Schopler |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 cv |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER Remanding Case. Court remands this case to the San Diego Superior Court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Court terminates Defendant's #3 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 9/16/2019. (cc: San Diego Superior Court) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jah) (sjt).
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ernestine Juhan. (sxa) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Ernestine Juhan. No Corporate Parents/Interested Parties. (sxa) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Superior Court of California County of San Diego, case number 37-2019-00024997-CL-UD-CTL., IFP Filed, filed by Ernestine Juhan, Does 1 through 5. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 State Court Complaint)The new case number is 3:19-cv-01724-BAS-AGS. Judge Cynthia Bashant and Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler are assigned to the case.(sxa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
