Fonseca v. Hewlett-Packard Company et al
| Bryant Fonseca |
| HP Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, ., HP Enterprise Services, LLC and Does 1-100 |
| 3:2019cv01748 |
| September 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Michael S Berg |
| Gonzalo P Curiel |
| Anti-Trust |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 nr |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
NOTICE of Attorney Withdrawal by HP Enterprise Services, LLC, HP Inc. re #6 Notice of Appearance, (Maneker, Meryl) (dlg).
|
|
Filing 13
REPLY to Response to Motion re #10 MOTION to Dismiss Counts Five, Six and Eight of Second Amended Complaint filed by HP Enterprise Services, LLC, HP Inc.. (Maneker, Meryl) (dlg).
|
|
Filing 12
RESPONSE in Opposition re #10 MOTION to Dismiss Counts Five, Six and Eight of Second Amended Complaint filed by Bryant Fonseca. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Counts Five, Six, and Eight of the Second Amended Complaint, #2 Declaration of Jeffrey L. Hogue in Support of Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Counts Five, Six, and Eight of the Second Amended Complaint, #3 Proof of Service)(Hogue, Jeffrey) (dlg).
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule re #10 MOTION to Dismiss Counts Five, Six and Eight of Second Amended Complaint : Any response shall be filed on or before October 18, 2019. Any reply shall be filed on or before October 25, 2019. A hearing on this matter is scheduled for November 22, 2019 at 1:30 PM in Courtroom 2D. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 9/20/19.(dlg)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION to Dismiss Counts Five, Six and Eight of Second Amended Complaint by HP Enterprise Services, LLC, HP Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities)(Maneker, Meryl) (dlg).
|
|
Filing 9
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by HP Enterprise Services, LLC, HP Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company re #1 Notice of Removal Amended Declaration of Service (Maneker, Meryl) (dlg).
|
|
Filing 8
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by HP Enterprise Services, LLC, HP Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company re #1 Notice of Removal (Maneker, Meryl) (dlg).
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by Valerie Phan on behalf of HP Enterprise Services, LLC, HP Inc. (Phan, Valerie)Attorney Valerie Phan added to party HP Enterprise Services, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Valerie Phan added to party HP Inc.(pty:dft) (dlg).
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Appearance by Mark Alan Rein on behalf of HP Enterprise Services, LLC, HP Inc. (Rein, Mark)Attorney Mark Alan Rein added to party HP Enterprise Services, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Mark Alan Rein added to party HP Inc.(pty:dft) (dlg).
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Appearance by Christina Camille Kwoka Semmer on behalf of HP Enterprise Services, LLC, HP Inc. (Semmer, Christina)Attorney Christina Camille Kwoka Semmer added to party HP Enterprise Services, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Christina Camille Kwoka Semmer added to party HP Inc.(pty:dft) (dlg).
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by Claudette G Wilson on behalf of HP Enterprise Services, LLC, HP Inc. (Wilson, Claudette)Attorney Claudette G Wilson added to party HP Enterprise Services, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Claudette G Wilson added to party HP Inc.(pty:dft) (dlg).
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF RELATED CASE(S) by HP Enterprise Services, LLC, HP Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company re #1 Notice of Removal. (sxa)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by HP Enterprise Services, LLC, HP Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company re #1 Notice of Removal. Identifying Other Affiliate Perspecta Inc for HP Enterprise Services, LLC. (sxa)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Superior Court of California County of San Diego, case number 37-2017-00045630-CU-WT-CTL. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-12929537.), filed by Hewlett-Packard Company, HP Inc., HP Enterprise Services, LLC,Does 1-100. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Second Amended State Court Complaint, #3 Declaration of Kim Ortolani, #4 Declaration of Meryl C. Maneker, #5 Exhibit A Part 1 to Appendix of Process, Pleadings and Orders, #6 Exhibit A Part 2 to Appendix of Process, Pleadings and Orders, #7 Exhibit A Part 3 to Appendix of Process, Pleadings and Orders, #8 Exhibit A Part 4 to Appendix of Process, Pleadings and Orders, #9 Exhibit A Part 5 to Appendix of Process, Pleadings and Orders, #10 Exhibit A Part 6 to Appendix of Process, Pleadings and Orders, #11 Exhibit A Part 7 to Appendix of Process, Pleadings and Orders, #12 Exhibit A Part 8 to Appendix of Process, Pleadings and Orders, #13 Exhibit A Part 9 to Appendix of Process, Pleadings and Orders, #14 Exhibit A Part 10 to Appendix of Process, Pleadings and Orders, #15 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal, #16 Exhibit B Part 1 to Appendix of Process, Pleadings and Orders, #17 Exhibit B Part 2 to Appendix of Process, Pleadings and Orders, #18 Exhibit B to Notice of Removal, #19 Exhibit C to Notice of Removal, #20 Exhibit D to Notice of Removal, #21 Exhibit F to Notice of Removal, #22 Exhibit G to Notice of Removal, #23 Exhibit H to Notice of Removal)The new case number is 3:19-cv-1748-GPC-MSB. Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel and Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg are assigned to the case. (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/11/2019: # 25 Appendix of Process, Pleadings and Orders) (sxa). (Attachment 24 replaced on 9/11/2019) (sxa).(sjt).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
