LaMotte v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Anita LaMotte
Defendant: Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. and Does 1-150
Case Number: 3:2019cv01804
Filed: September 18, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Cynthia Bashant
Referring Judge: Ruben B Brooks
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 19, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION to File Documents Under Seal (With attachments)(Wegner, Lisa)
September 19, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Julie Rae Trotter on behalf of Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. (Trotter, Julie)Attorney Julie Rae Trotter added to party Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.(pty:dft)
September 19, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE by Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal,,, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Corrected to Declaration of Le Dabney ISO Removal, #2 Exhibit 2 Corrected to Declaration of Le Dabney ISO Removal, #3 Proof of Service)(Wegner, Lisa)
September 18, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. Identifying Corporate Parent Kohl's Corporation, Other Affiliate Blackrock, Other Affiliate Vanguard for Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. (jmo) (jao).
September 18, 2019 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE by Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K)(jmo) (jao).
September 18, 2019 Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. (jmo) (jao).
September 18, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from San Diego County Superior Court, case number 37-2019-00041329-CU-OE-CTL. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-12959958.), filed by Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Exhibit 1- State court complaint, #3 Exhibit 2 - State court file, #4 Exhibit 3- First amended complaint, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Declaration of Lisa A. Wegner in Support, #7 Declaration Trent Bavaro in Support, #8 Declaration of Le Dabney in Support, #9 Exhibit 1 - Redacted, #10 Exhibit 2 - ID, #11 Exhibit 3 - Redacted, #12 Proof of Service)The new case number is 3:19-cv-01804-BAS-RBB. Judge Cynthia Bashant and Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks are assigned to the case.(jmo) (jao).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LaMotte v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
Represented By: Julie Rae Trotter
Represented By: Lisa Amy Wegner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-150
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anita LaMotte
Represented By: Christopher M. Heikaus Weaver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?