L & M Development Corporation of S.D v. Gregory et al
| L & M Development Corporation of S.D |
| DOES 1-10, Rowena Gregory and James Gregory |
| 3:2019cv01940 |
| October 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
| Bernard G Skomal |
| Rent Lease & Ejectment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 ac |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER Sua Sponte Remanding Case to State Court. Defendants' motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. No. #3 ] is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 10/8/19.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service, certified copy sent to State Court)(dlg) (sjt).
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by James Gregory, Rowena Gregory. (sxa) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by James Gregory, Rowena Gregory re #1 Notice of Removal. No Parties With Financial Interest. (sxa) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California County of San Diego, case number 37-02019-0002610-CL-UD-CTL., IFP Filed, filed by James Gregory, Rowena Gregory, DOES 1-10. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 State Court Complaint)The new case number is 3:19-cv-01940-CAB-BGS. Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal are assigned to the case.(sxa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
