Banks v. Wild Paul, Inc. et al
| Dwight Banks |
| DOES 1-10, Wild Paul, Inc., Peckham Properties, Inc. and Wild Paul, Inc. doing business as Camels Breath, Inn |
| 3:2019cv01941 |
| October 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Janis L Sammartino |
| Bernard G Skomal |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Dwight Banks Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) (Taibi, Michael) (jpp). |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (sxa) (jao). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Dwight Banks re #1 Complaint. No Parties With Financial Interest. (sxa) (jao). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Peckham Properties, Inc., Wild Paul, Inc., DOES 1-10 ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-13030671.), filed by Dwight Banks. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-01941-JLS-BGS. Judge Janis L. Sammartino and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal are assigned to the case. (Taibi, Michael)(sxa) (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
