Jackson v. Frantoni, Inc. et al
Jerry Jackson |
DOES 1-10, Frantoni, Inc., Hawthorn Place, LLC and Frantoni, Inc. doing business as Puerto La Boca Argentinian Grill |
3:2019cv01988 |
October 14, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Mitchell D Dembin |
John A Houston |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by Frantoni, Inc. (Cherner, Andres) Attorney Andres Cherner added to party Frantoni, Inc. (pty:dft) (tcf). |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jerry Jackson. Frantoni, Inc. served. (Taibi, Michael) (tcf). |
Filing 3 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (jmo) |
Filing 2 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties by Jerry Jackson. No Parties With Financial Interest. (jmo) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against DOES 1-10, Frantoni, Inc., Hawthorn Place, LLC ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-13053590.), filed by Jerry Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-01988-JAH-MDD. Judge John A. Houston and Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin are assigned to the case. (Taibi, Michael)(jmo) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.