Trim v. BMW Financial Services NA, LLC
| Martin Trim |
| BMW Financial Services NA, LLC and BMW Financial Services NA, LLC doing business as Alphera Financial Services |
| 3:2019cv02081 |
| October 31, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
| Roger T Benitez |
| Mitchell D Dembin |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel G. Shay on behalf of Martin Trim (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Shay, Daniel)Attorney Daniel G. Shay added to party Martin Trim(pty:pla) (anh). |
| Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Roger T. Benitez is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo for all further proceedings. The new case number is 19cv2081-CAB-MDD.(no document attached) (mme) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (sxa)(jrd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT With Jury Demand Against BMW Financial Services NA, LLC (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-13114614.), filed by Martin Trim. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-02081-BEN-MDD. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin are assigned to the case. (Hart, Yana)(sxa)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
