Rosas v. Masjedi et al
Sergio Mata Rosas and Sergio Mata Rosas an individual doing business as Romas Produce |
Shannon Masjedi, Eddie Masjedi, Royalty Foods Partners, LLC, Shannon Masjedi an individual doing business as San Diego Farmers Outlet and Eddie Masjedi an individual doing business as San Diego Farmers Outlet |
3:2019cv02130 |
November 5, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Allison H Goddard |
Dana M Sabraw |
Agriculture Acts |
07 U.S.C. § 0499 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 15 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Dana M. Sabraw: Status Conference held on 12/13/2019. All appearances were telephonic. (Court Reporter/ECR Lee Ann Pence). (Plaintiff Attorney Mitch Wallis). (Defendant Attorney Bo Solis). (no document attached) (jak) |
Filing 14 RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Sergio Mata Rosas. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Plaintiff, #2 Exhibit Statement of Information)(Wallis, Mitch) (aef). |
Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #8 MOTION for Entry of Default , #9 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order , #6 MOTION for Entry of Default filed by Shannon Masjedi. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Robert J. Solis, Esq., Regarding Entry of Default, #2 Declaration of Shannon Masjedi in Opposition to Application for Temporary Restraining Order)(Solis, Robert) (aef). |
![]() |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Errata by Sergio Mata Rosas re #9 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order (Wallis, Mitch) Modified on 12/9/2019 QC mailer sent re improper withdrawal of document (aef). |
Filing 9 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Sergio Mata Rosas. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of Mitch Wallis, #3 Notice of hearing, #4 Proof of Service)(Wallis, Mitch) (aef). |
![]() |
Filing 8 MOTION for Entry of Default by Sergio Mata Rosas. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Mitch Wallis)(Wallis, Mitch) (aef). |
Filing 7 ***DEFAULT SET ASIDE PER ECF #16 *** - Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Royalty Foods Partners, LLC. (aef) Modified on 12/19/2019 to set aside default (aef). |
Filing 6 Request for Entry of Clerk's Default filed as - MOTION for Entry of Default by Sergio Mata Rosas. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Mitch Wallis)(Wallis, Mitch) Modified on 12/3/2019 to match document title; term motion (aef). |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sergio Mata Rosas. Eddie Masjedi served. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of mailing)(Wallis, Mitch) (aef). |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sergio Mata Rosas. Shannon Masjedi served. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of mailing)(Wallis, Mitch) (aef). |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sergio Mata Rosas. Royalty Foods Partners, LLC served. (Wallis, Mitch) (aef). |
Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (sxa)(jrd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Against Eddie Masjedi, Shannon Masjedi, Royalty Foods Partners, LLC (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-13133450.), filed by Sergio Mata Rosas. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A)The new case number is 3:19-cv-2130-DMS-AHG. Judge Dana M. Sabraw and Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard are assigned to the case. (Wallis, Mitch)(sxa)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.