Masterson v. Saul
| Arlene Elizabeth Masterson |
| Andrew Saul |
| 3:2019cv02200 |
| November 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Andrew G Schopler |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0402 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Arlene Elizabeth Masterson. Andrew Saul served. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Perales, Monica) (mme). |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by S. Wyeth McAdam on behalf of Andrew Saul (McAdam, S.)Attorney S. Wyeth McAdam added to party Andrew Saul(pty:dft) (mme). |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to First Amended Complaint. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (mme) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT For Review of The Final Decision Of The Social Security against Andrew Saul, filed by Arlene Elizabeth Masterson.New Summons Requested. (Perales, Monica) (mme). |
| Filing 6 Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, Pursuant to General Order 707, by Arlene Elizabeth Masterson. (smd) |
Filing 5
ORDER granting #3 Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, Dismissing the Complaint Without Prejudice, and Closing the Case, With Leave to Amend. The Court grants plaintiff IFP status and waives the filing fee. But the complaint fails to state a claim and thus is dismissed without prejudice under 1915(e). Plaintiff may automatically reopen the case by submitting an amended complaint by January 3, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler on 11/25/2019. (mme)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF SOCIAL SECURITY CASE ASSIGNMENT. Pursuant to General Order 707, United States Magistrate Andrew G. Schopler has been randomly assigned. Plaintiff should print and complete the attached consent/declination form. The executed form must be received by the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of this notice. (jxv) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Arlene Elizabeth Masterson. (jxv) |
| Filing 2 Certification and Notice of Party With Financial Interest by Arlene Elizabeth Masterson. No Parties With Financial Interest. (jxv) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, IFP Filed, filed by Arlene Elizabeth Masterson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-02200-AGS. Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler is assigned to the case. (Perales, Monica)(jxv) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Masterson v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Represented By: | U S Attorney CV |
| Represented By: | S. Wyeth McAdam |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Arlene Elizabeth Masterson | |
| Represented By: | Monica Perales |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
